Parion Academic Review Journal Review Process

The Parion Academic Review Journal employs a double-blind peer review process to ensure unbiased and objective evaluation of submitted articles. The review process follows the following steps:

1. Submission: Authors can submit their articles online through the DergiPark system. Submissions must adhere to the journal's writing guidelines and other directives published on this website.
2. Initial Screening: The journal editor conducts an initial screening of submitted articles to assess their suitability for the journal's scope and format. Articles deemed suitable by the editor are sent for peer review.
3. Peer Review: Each article is reviewed by a peer reviewer. Reviewers evaluate the originality, methodology, findings, conclusions, contribution to the literature, and overall academic quality of the article. Reviewers submit their evaluations online through the DergiPark system.
4. Notification of Review Results: After the completion of the peer review process, the editor compiles the reviews and informs the authors. Authors may revise their articles based on the reviewers' suggestions.
5. Revision and Final Decision: Authors revise their articles based on the reviewers' suggestions and resubmit the revised manuscript through the DergiPark system. The editor makes the final decision after reviewing the revised manuscript.
6. Publication: Articles deemed suitable for publication are published in the Parion Academic Review Journal.

Important Considerations Regarding the Review Process:

• The review process is anonymous. Reviewers and authors are unaware of each other's identities.
• Reviewers must evaluate articles objectively and impartially.
• Authors must revise their articles based on the reviewers' suggestions.
• The Parion Academic Review Journal is committed to conducting a transparent and fair peer review process. This ensures the publication of high-quality articles in the journal.